Saturday, December 31, 2016

Tuesday, December 27, 2016

Saturday, December 24, 2016

Friday, December 23, 2016

Thursday, December 22, 2016

Merry Christmas!

Fake News (by the Left)

As we head into the holidays, it is getting hard to keep track of how many of the election-related "hate crimes" have been proven false. Not only are they false, but they are almost always perpetrated by leftists.

Here are the latest examples of false hate crimes that made big headlines.

Police in Ann Arbor, Michigan, yesterday said that a female university student lied about her claim that a white Trump supporter had threatened to set her on fire unless she removed her hijab. This story got major press coverage and was repeatedly cited as evidence of a massive spike in bigotry against Muslims after the election. It never happened.

Remember the horrific reports about the black church that was torched and the words "Vote Trump" were spray painted on the building? I recoiled in disgust when I heard the shocking news.

Well, I'm pleased to say the police have made an arrest in the case. Sadly, the arsonist was a member of the church's congregation.

Now think about this for a moment. These people are part of a movement that is pushing the narrative that America is a horribly racist and bigoted country. When there is no evidence of it, they make it up.

They must know that they are creating the very "atmosphere of fear" that they claim to be against. And they are the ones who are pushing the country closer and closer to a disaster.

Sadly, we have seen this sort of false propaganda in the past. Left-wing totalitarian regimes like the Nazis and the Soviets often exploit "false flag" events.

There is enormous irony here. The left thinks that crimes motivated by hate are particularly egregious and deserve greater punishment. Yet making up a false hate crime is its own form of hate -- hate against white people or conservatives, smearing innocent people to advance a political agenda. How twisted is that?

Don't get me wrong, folks. I am not suggesting there is no problem in America with racism. We should always be working toward racial reconciliation.

I believe that one of the best ways to achieve that goal is through the understanding that we are all made in God's image, and because of that, skin color is beside the point. Unfortunately, the left fights against God and any vestige of faith in the public square too.

Three New Terrorist Attacks

In recent days, there have been three deadly terrorist attacks in three different countries.

In Jordan, ten people were killed (a Canadian woman among them) and 34 were wounded in an attack on a crusader castle which is a popular tourist destination. Seven of the dead were Jordanian security forces fighting to defeat the terrorists. The fight started in an apartment building after the landlord reported that the men had explosives. One policeman was killed there, and the four gunmen fled 30 miles to the castle, where there were tourists and where the terrorists could hide behind the thick walls. Only quick action by the Jordanian police saved a lot of other lives.

In Turkey, a policeman killed the Russian Ambassador during the opening of an exhibit of Russian paintings. The attacker yelled that this was in revenge for Aleppo and shouted passages from a Hadith favored by Islamists. The terrorist-policeman was admitted to the exhibit by showing his security badge (much like in my novel Treason, in which security services secretly loyal to Islamic supremacists undermine American security).

Also, in Turkey, a shot was fired outside the United States embassy in Ankara. The State Department has announced additional security precautions.

In Berlin, an attacker drove a truck into a popular Christmas market next to the Berlin Zoo and killed twelve people while injuring about fifty others.

Chancellor Merkel described it as an act of terror.

These events are all reminders that while the American news media obsessed over a possible electoral college revolt which did not take place (Clinton actually lost more electors than Trump), the terrorists grew stronger and more widespread.

The new Trump Administration will have to develop a completely new strategy if we are to defeat those who want to destroy us.

These three attacks in three different countries are reminders of the cancer that is growing.

And of course, none of this includes the violence of Syria, Iraq, Libya, and Somalia.

The world is becoming more dangerous as our media becomes more frivolous.

About Liberals

Monday, December 19, 2016

The Electors

Threatening the Electors

Why isn't DOJ threatening prosecution against those who are threatening our electors??? That is election tampering! That is sedition! Human fecal matter like Michael Moore offering to pay electors to break the law? Democrats assailing electors with emails, phone calls, and snail mail in order to get them to break the law? These contacts can be traced. Where is Obama? Instead of telling these fools to knock it off, he stirs the Russia conspiracy pot and cultivates their activities. And don't get me going about Clinton, that two faced liar who lectured us all after the debate with Trump when he refused to say he would accept the outcome until the dust settles. She who told us that his response would undermine our nation, she of the party of Al Gore who did the very thing she decried, she now is doing the very thing she labeled as unAmerican. There is a reason those people are the party of the ass; there is a reason they are called damnocraps.

In reality if "the people" want to get rid of the Electoral System, then it is utter MOB RULE! Do we really want an uniformed public voting into office someone who has great abs?! People have actually said they voted for Ryan because of his fantastic abs. Or someone with good name recognition only? Like the Bushes or Clintons? Think about it.

Saturday, December 17, 2016

Thursday, December 15, 2016

Restoring The Right To Life

Of all the tragedies of abortion on demand, one of the worst may be that countless innocent American girls have been taught by the culture, and even sometimes by their parents, that their dignity and opportunity depends on their ability to destroy their own unborn children. I believe this sad fact is doing more to destroy America than what any foreign enemy could ever do.

That's not hyperbole, my friends. One million abortions a year is roughly 2,700 abortions a day. We are committing a 9/11 almost every day.

I was reminded what abortion on demand does to young women by an extraordinary confession of one mother on "The View" recently. The mother was Ali Wentworth, wife of ABC News anchor and Clinton loyalist George Stephanopoulos. Wentworth told the panel that when it was obvious Clinton was going to lose the election, her 14 year-old daughter was in tears as she screamed that the election would mean "No Abortion!"

When I read that, it broke my heart. It wasn't that many years ago when 14 year-old girls dreamed of someday meeting the person they would love and who would love them, and with that person bringing new life into the world. It is unnerving to think how many of our daughters and granddaughters may now be convinced that there is nothing more noble than to destroy that life before the child can take her first breath outside the womb.

There are lots of things that must be dealt with in the coming years. But anyone who thinks abortion won't be a big issue just needs to look at what Obama is doing on his way out the door. According to the Washington Times, the Obama Administration finalized a rule yesterday that "requires states to distribute dollars from Title X of the Public Health Service Act without taking into account whether recipient clinics perform abortions." This new regulation is set to take effect on January 18th, two days before Donald Trump and Mike Pence take office.

In spite of public opposition to taxpayer funding of abortions, the Obama Administration is doing everything it can to guarantee that your hard-earned tax dollars are used to subsidize the nation's largest abortion business.

In a very important meeting yesterday, I reminded the attendees that America will not be great again until the day comes when all of our children are welcomed into the world, protected by the law, have a seat at the table and are part of the American family.

We must restore the right to life -- the first right our founding fathers recognized as an unalienable right granted not by government, but our Creator. With your prayers and financial support, American Values will continue to make the case for protecting innocent unborn babies.

CIA Clams Up

The CIA had a lot to say recently about Russia's supposed role in influencing the election. Rep. Devin Nunes, chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, was particularly interested in learning more after information leaked last week claiming that the agency had determined that Russia was trying to help Donald Trump win.

So he called for a closed door hearing for members of the Intelligence Committee with officials from the CIA, the FBI, the NSA and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. Now, however, CIA chief John Brennan has clammed up. He refused to send a representative to yesterday's scheduled hearing, citing President Obama's order for a complete review of the information.

Chairman Nunes is furious, and rightly so. The CIA is casting doubt on the fairness of the election, but it won't explain itself to members of Congress.

Nunes blasted the CIA's "intransigence" as "unacceptable," and warned of the possible "manipulation of intelligence for political purposes."

The left is demanding that the Electoral College overturn the results of the election based on rumors that the Obama Administration is now refusing to explain. This is unprecedented!

Like all red-blooded Americans, I am infuriated by the thought that Russia would attempt to influence our elections. But anyone who thinks that Wikileaks or DNC leaks caused Hillary Clinton's loss must be smoking some of that newly legal marijuana.

It is not credible in my view that Vladimir Putin preferred the election of the candidate who made it clear that the days of pushing America around were over. Clinton, in contrast, was the nominee of the party that resisted efforts to rein in first the Soviet Union and now Russia.

Fortunately, most Americans aren't buying the left's nonsense. A new poll finds that just 32% of Americans believe Russia's attempts to influence the election helped Trump, while 59% say Russia's efforts had no effect. That 32% probably thinks Elvis is hanging out with Martians too.

Some observers think Putin may have been trying to undermine the confidence of the American people in our constitutional republic. The firestorm being created by the media and the left, suggesting that somehow the election wasn't fair, is playing right into his hands.

Sadly, it is clear that the left will resort to anything in order to complete its fundamental transformation of America into a European-style welfare state that spends its time apologizing for its existence. That should outrage Americans far more than the hacking of the DNC.

Wednesday, December 14, 2016

Wednesday, December 07, 2016

Denzel Washington blasts media for selling 'BS'

He was at the center of a fake news story, but Denzel Washington says it's the mainstream media that's selling "BS."

"If you don't read the newspaper, you're uninformed. If you do read it, you're misinformed," Washington, the star and director behind the new film "Fences," told ITK at the Wednesday premiere inside the National Museum of African American History and Culture.

"Fences," based on an award-winning play of the same name, also features Viola Davis and centers on the life of a black family in 1950s Pittsburgh. It is set to be released on Christmas.

Washington was the subject of a phony story earlier this year that falsely claimed he was switching his support of then-Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton to GOP White House hopeful Donald Trump.

One of the effects of "too much information," the 61-year-old Oscar winner says, is "the need to be first, not even to be true anymore."

"So what a responsibility you all have — to tell the truth," Washington exclaimed to the pack of reporters gathered on the red carpet.

"In our society, now it's just first — who cares, get it out there. We don't care who it hurts. We don't care who we destroy. We don't care if it's true," Washington continued.

"Just say it, sell it. Anything you practice you'll get good at — including BS."

This is why I LOVE this guy!

He could have taken a presidential salary, like every other President before him, but he won't. This is why I love this guy! He doesn't need more money and isn't going to be greedy and take a Presidential salary the whole time he is in office. Smart move on his part, one that most Americans agree with! Go Trump GO! Donald Trump’s overall arguments are a winning one. According to Caddell’s research, Americans believe the following by overwhelming margins.

1. The power of ordinary people to control our country is getting weaker every day, as political leaders on both sides, fight to protect their own power and privilege, at the expense of the nation’s well-being. We need to restore what we really believe in – real democracy by the people and real free-enterprise. AGREE = 87%; DISAGREE = 10%

2. The country is run by an alliance of incumbent politicians, media pundits, lobbyists and other powerful money interests for their own gain at the expense of the American people. AGREE = 87%; DISAGREE = 10%

3. Most politicians really care about people like me. AGREE = 25%; DISAGREE = 69%

4. Powerful interests from Wall Street banks to corporations, unions and political interest groups have used campaign and lobbying money to rig the system for them. They are looting the national treasury of billions of dollars at the expense of every man, woman and child. AGREE = 81%; DISAGREE = 13%

5. The U.S. has a two-track economy where most Americans struggle every day, where good jobs are hard to find, where huge corporations get all the rewards. We need fundamental changes to fix the inequity in our economic system. AGREE = 81%; DISAGREE = 15%

6. Political leaders are more interested in protecting their power and privilege than doing what is right for the American people. AGREE = 86%; DISAGREE = 11%

7. The two main political parties are too beholden to special and corporate interest to create any meaningful change. AGREE = 76%; DISAGREE = 19%

8. The real struggle for America is not between Democrats and Republicans but between mainstream American and the ruling political elites. AGREE = 67%; DISAGREE = 24%

Sunday, December 04, 2016

The Slow Down Movement

More and more people in the US and other hyper-computer societies we are facing a extremely serious problem, the decreasing need for humans in business, government, and even society. This horrible effect is growing faster and faster as new advanced technologies make people increasingly redundant. In many ways, this will be good, in agriculture for example where migrants wont be treated like slave labor and end up peeing in the fields, spreading disease into US grocery chains. Humans are rapidly becoming unneeded in the work force and that's very very bad indeed! Luckily in the United States there is a way around this mess, its called the Slow Down Movement. In France a few years back the people started getting upset at all the rapid changes, especially in the food industry where McDonalds was coming into Europe and decimating local food businesses. The Slow Down Movement began in France and has spread across much of Europe. The result has been it has prevented US fast food chains from dominating the continent, thus slowing down the rapid pace of change and letting people "catch up" to modern ways of doing things. We too in America could do the same thing. I propose the Technology Control Act of 2016 (or the Slow Down law): any technology that removes more than 50,000 jobs within the USA must be voted on by the people! If adopted it would keep more people in the labor force: its cheaper for corporations to get rid of truck drivers, fast food workers, etc. Technology has already helped devastated the middle class here in the USA and will only produce a enormous permanent poor class if we don't change. We have to have jobs for these people, otherwise it will mean either anarchy or bankruptcy for the country. 

So very true!

Tuesday, November 29, 2016

Fairwell Fidel (and good riddance!)

Fidel Castro: A Litmus Test of American Political Thinking
Paul Roderick Gregory , 

MIAMI, FL – NOVEMBER 26: Miami residents celebrate the death of Fidel Castro on November 26, 2016

Fidel Castro is dead at age 90. In power for more than a half century, his regime ruled the last planned socialist economy. (Unless we include quirky North Korea). In 1957, when Castro launched his Cuban revolution, Cuban GDP per capita equaled the Latin American average. On the day of Fidel’s death, it has fallen to less than half that average.  Over the fifty years of Castro’s communist rule, Cuba went from being among the more prosperous countries of Latin America to being among its poorest. When Fidel marched victoriously into Havana, it had fifty-eight national newspapers. Now it has six, all published by the Cuban communist party and its affiliates.

When Communism fell in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, advocates of Communism throughout the world shrugged. They argued that the Communist system is sound. The problem is that Communist countries have had the wrong leaders. Communist true believers, the world over, had to put their faith in Fidel and to hope that his example would spread Communism beyond Cuba’s shores – to countries like Venezuela and Nicaragua. Communist true believers looked at Fidel’s Cuba and praised its health-care and education systems, its income equality, and the fact that Cuba survived the U.S. embargo. They ignored the fact the Fidel remained in power thanks to repression of political opponents, his willingness to lose his most ambitious citizens as boat people to the US, and cheap oil as a client state of the USSR and then Venezuela.

Two decades back, only ten percent of Americans viewed Cuba favorably. On the day of Fidel’s death, more than half of Americans have a positive view of Cuba. The party divide is enormous: Three quarters of Democrats and one third of Republicans hold positive views of Cuba. In the 1960s, the New Left, with its ubiquitous Che posters, was enraptured by Castro and the Cuban model. More recent assessments by socialists fret that Cuba is not striving for a true form of socialism.

The American Left views Fidel as a veteran, battle-scarred in his battle against a US imperialism, bent on Cuba’s destruction. Despite all these obstacles, as stated by Bernie Sanders in 1985, people “forget that Castro educated their kids, gave their kids healthcare, and totally transformed society” in a “revolution of values.” The American Right sees Fidel’s Cuba as an oppressive one-party state that permits no dissent. It is managed by a regime that has run the economy into the ground, despite accomplishments in education and health care. Equality in Cuba means an equal right to poverty.

An oppressive dictator who imprisons opponents and forces his best-and-brightest to flee or a heroic leader thumbing his nose in the face of the global hegemon while providing his people with education and health, one thing is clear:  The Castro planned socialist economy has doomed the Cuban people to lives of poverty. If Cuba had simply matched the lackluster performance of Latin America, the Cuban people would have double the living standard they have today.

The rise in favorable American opinion about Cuba, especially among Democrats, reflects the leftward tilt of their thinking, and a naïve belief, as expressed by the Sanders campaign, that Democratic Socialism is possible. If so, let them give one real-world example, and not the phony Scandinavian model. Fidel knew otherwise and did not tinker with democracy, and he died in power. Gorbachev did not, and he was unceremoniously dumped from power. I imagine Raul Castro is aware of these facts.

Saturday, November 26, 2016

Islam and the Democrat Party

Reposting this GREAT article

Kim Davis Uproar Shows That Breaking The Law Is Only Okay When Progressives Do It
By Sean Davis9/3/2015

The main contestant on this week’s edition of Internet outrage theater is Kim Davis, a Democratic clerk in Kentucky who is refusing to issue marriage licenses to gay couples. Davis, who was arrested by police today for not issuing the licenses, says her religious beliefs prohibit her from rubber-stamping applications for same-sex marriage licenses:

    U.S. District Court Judge David Bunning placed Rowan County Clerk Kim Davis in the custody of U.S. marshals until she complies, saying fines were not enough to force her to comply with his previous order to provide the paperwork to all couples and allowing her to defy the order would create a “ripple effect.”

    “Her good-faith belief is simply not a viable defense,” Bunning said. “Oaths mean things.”

    Davis, who was tearful at times, testified that she could not obey the order because God’s law trumps the court.

    “My conscience will not allow it,” she said. “God’s moral law convicts me and conflicts with my duties.”

Davis’s arrest was met with cheers by same-sex marriage advocates who for some reason did not demand imprisonment of officials who lawlessly issued gay marriage licenses in clear contravention of state and federal laws. Take, for example, Democrat Gavin Newsom, who is currently the California lieutenant governor. Back in 2004, when gay marriage was banned under California state law, Newsom openly defied the law and used his power as the mayor of San Francisco to force taxpayer-funded government clerks to issue gay marriage licenses:

    Newsom unleashed a political and legal tempest February 12 when he ordered the city clerk to begin issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples.

    Nearly 3,200 same-sex couples have gotten licenses in a nine-day frenzy that included thousands of family, friends and soon-to-be betrothed couples ringing City Hall, sometimes for days.

Just like Kim Davis, who is an elected Democrat, Newsom justified his lawlessness by citing his own conscience and beliefs about right and wrong rather than deferring to the actual laws of his state.

If you look for evidence of gay rights advocates chastising Newsom for his blatant lawlessness, you won’t find it. Because it doesn’t exist. You similarly won’t find any evidence of these principled law enforcement purists chastising California state officials for refusing to enforce or defend the Prop 8 ballot initiative in California, which was passed overwhelmingly by California voters.

And don’t you dare look for evidence of high-minded progressives demanding prison sentences for the Washington, D.C. bureaucrats who openly defied federal court orders to issue concealed carry permits in the nation’s capital. Nope. Instead of enforcing the law as handed down in multiple Supreme Court cases, D.C. officials kept manufacturing new reasons to justify their refusal to comply with federal gun laws.

Don’t even get me started on federal laws regarding drug possession. You won’t find progressives calling for the prosecution of scores of Colorado officials in open defiance of federal drug bans, or calling for the heads of federal officials who refuse to enforce federal drug laws in Colorado. No, those federal laws are icky. Sure, they’re indisputably the law of the land. And sure, officials have a duty to equally apply and enforce standing law, but icky laws are different. Only non-icky laws need to be enforced.

Perhaps natural marriage advocates should abandon their religious liberty arguments and instead declare whole cities to be marriage sanctuaries. That strategy has worked splendidly for open borders advocates. Who cares what the federal law requires when it comes to illegal immigration? Those laws restricting citizenship rights to citizens are icky, so they don’t need to be enforced. Sanctuary cities are great, so long as they provide sanctuary from icky laws of which progressives disapprove.

Oh, and those laws regarding the proper handling of classified national security information? Meh. Yeah, those are icky, too. So lay off Hillary Clinton, you dirty law truther. Who cares if she ignored clear law and policy by setting up an unsecured, unsanctioned e-mail server which was then used to house and distribute classified information? Who cares if President Barack Obama himself signed the executive order mandating the protection of national security information, the unauthorized release of which could damage American safety and security? Who cares if she intentionally sent classified information to people outside the government who were never cleared to receive it? Progressives think that law is icky, too, so you’ll have to excuse them from not caring about Hillary’s blatant violation of it (laws regarding the handling of classified information are totally not icky, though, when applied to Republicans like David Petraeus or Scooter Libby).

When you really think about it, though, this whole kerfuffle is obviously the fault of Kim Davis, the Kentucky clerk who refuses to issue gay marriage licenses. She should’ve known better. She should’ve thought this whole thing through.

If Kim Davis really wanted to avoid the ire and attention of progressives and their media allies, she should’ve just videotaped herself killing babies and then selling their organs. Then she could operate with total impunity.

Sean Davis is the co-founder of The Federalist.

Tuesday, November 22, 2016

The Prediction

No matter what anyone tells you or what you believe, the facts are this: Obama has been the worse President in US history, especially to the jewish citizens of America and of Israel. No President has ever given such a huge amount of money to the enemies that want to kill us (Iran, $100 BILLION + dollars). No President has ever sold more weapons to the muslim world; Obama and twice as much at $200 billion dollars. No American President has gutted the US military like Obama has: he's fired more Admirals and Generals than Carter, Reagan, Bush, Clinton, and Bush Jr COMBINED! He's allowed the US military to become weak, encouraging our enemies to attack us and our  European allies, Japan, Taiwan, etc. He utterly destroyed our success in Iraq and let ISIS form under his nose. He is a stealth muslim and I believe that within a few years of him leaving the Oval Office, he will suddenly "convert" to islam. I know this will happen. Its coming. Anyone who doesn't see this is incredibly foolish, and the damage done to our country by having muslims in high levels of the US government will never be undone. Look at evil Hillary Clinton's aide, Huma: a muslim who has stockpiled over 650,00 government emails on her home computer. Now why would anyone want to keep that many emails? The Congress told her to give them all the computers and networked devices she had over to them, but she didn't give it all up. Its blackmail, pure and simple. That many emails can only possibly be used for one thing. Blackmail. The Yahoo server I use limits you to just 10,000 emails, so you have to go out of your way to store 650,000 of them. BTW Huma uses Yahoo. When Odummy converts to islam, we will have to go back and look at all the possible ways he has damaged this country, and ways he could in the future. Its clear our alliance with Israel couldn't possibly be worse, a sign of his pro-islam leanings. Overall his Presidency will go down as one of the wost in history, from his ugly involvement in the Clinton/Trump presidential run to stupendous amounts of money being wasted and destroying our economic future. We're so royally screwed, thanks to Obummer!

Saturday, November 19, 2016

Tuesday, November 15, 2016

Monday, November 14, 2016

The Violent Left Attacks

Early Signals
Here are some signals President-elect Trump sent on the kind of president he will be:

Trump said that he would not be taking big vacations or a salary as president.

He called the family of a New York City police sergeant who was gunned down recently.

He is providing food and drinks to police officers who are protecting Trump Tower from deranged demonstrators.

Violence Continues
There is no need to review what the left-wing storm troopers have been doing in cities such as Portland. While there have been a few reported incidents of Trump supporters crossing the line, many of these so-called hate crimes are complete fabrications.

For example, the Louisiana student who claimed her hijab had been ripped off by a Trump supporter has confessed that she lied and is now being charged for filing a false police report.

Last night, during an interview on "60 Minutes," Trump looked into the camera and told his supporters who might be engaging in such behavior to stop it. When will Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton do the same?

Sadly, the vast majority of the violence is coming from the left, as it so often does.

A Trump supporter in Connecticut was attacked.

A Trump supporter was choked on a Bronx subway.

A Trump supporter in Chicago was viciously beaten.

Twitter, which is quick to ban conservatives, erupted in assassination threats against Trump. Now "Rape Melania" is trending.

Homes are being vandalized with anti-Trump graffiti.

Liberals who are telling the left to calm down are being excoriated. Last week, Oprah Winfrey tweeted, "Everybody take a deep breath! Hope lives." The left-wing backlash was immediate.

The entire media complex tried to convince America that when Trump lost, his supporters would refuse to accept the results and they would be the ones rioting in the streets. Well, the results are in and one-third of Clinton supporters are refusing to accept them. Her supporters are the people in the streets today.

Big media has a special obligation to condemn the vandalism, riots and hate crimes perpetrated by the left in recent days.

The Left's Hypocrisy
Liberal commentators who got the election all wrong are now demanding that Donald Trump reassure his opponents. Where were these concerned voices when the Supreme Court and the left overturned thousands of years of Western Civilization and redefined marriage?

What did Obama do in the wake of that decision? He stuck his finger in the eyes of concerned Americans by bathing the White House in the "rainbow" of the gay rights movement. It's only when the right wins that the media find any obligation for the victor to be magnanimous.

The media are also trying to demoralize conservatives by claiming that Trump is already backing down from things he campaigned on. The best example is Obamacare.

Over the weekend, Trump suggested that ideas such as letting college students stay on their parent's health insurance and providing coverage for pre-existing conditions may be kept. CNN gleefully ran this headline, "Is Donald Trump Already Walking Away From Campaign Promises?"

No, he isn't. Trump has been consistent on this.

This is the same media that justified its over-the-top bias against Donald Trump. The American people didn't fall for the media's spin before the election. Hopefully they won't fall for it now.

More Bizarre Behavior
Last week the superintendent of the Baltimore school system tweeted this: "show your muslim, black, latino, jewish, disabled, or just non-white [students], that you love them and will protect them!" Translation: Love all students but the white ones.

While expressing his commitment to "diversity and inclusion," Matt Maloney, the CEO of Grubhub, sent out a post-election message essentially telling Trump supporters working at his company to resign. While Maloney stands by his comments, he says they were misconstrued. Well, don't misconstrue my comments: Trump supporters should boycott Grubhub!

Victoria Smith was scheduled to perform the honorary first serve at this weekend's volleyball game at Southern Methodist University. Miss Smith had planned to offer the serve in memory of her father, Sgt. Michael Smith, one of the Dallas police officers killed during the July 7th Black Lives Matter protest. But the university rescinded the invitation fearing her serve could be "deemed insensitive." An email from the university cited "recent events [presumably the election] and diversity within the SMU community."

Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN), who has ties to Louis Farrakhan, appears to be the front-runner for chairman of the Democrat National Committee. Is a far-left Muslim really the right guy to repair the party's image with Middle America?

Former Labor Secretary Robert Reich is threatening to form a third party if Democrats don't give in to progressive demands.

The Wall WILL Work!

The Truth About Obama

Thursday, November 10, 2016

About That Performance

Donald Trump won a historic victory Tuesday. It appears he will win the Electoral College vote 306 to 232. He did it by carrying states that haven't voted Republican in decades.

Iowa -- While George W. Bush carried Iowa in 2004, the state had voted Democrat in six of the previous seven elections.

Michigan had not voted for a Republican presidential candidate since 1988.

Pennsylvania had not voted Republican since 1988.

Wisconsin had not voted Republican since Ronald Reagan's 1984 landslide.

The emerging consensus is that Hillary Clinton failed to energize the Obama coalition and underperformed with younger and minority voters. That is true to a point.

But in Florida, Clinton actually outperformed Obama. According to one analysis, Clinton won about 250,000 more votes than Obama won in 2012. Thankfully, Trump won 120,000 more votes than Clinton. And he outperformed Mitt Romney by more than 440,000 votes in the Sunshine State!

Why the Establishment Was Wrong

One of the most amazing things about Donald Trump’s historic victory was how badly almost everyone in media and politics misread the country.

Time and again in the months before the election, the establishment suggested I was either insincere or insane in predicting a Trump victory.

Our differences reflected two very different understandings of reality.

The establishment’s self-reassuring assumption was that the American electorate was the same as it was in 2008 and 2012, only more so. This led them to believe that no Republican could win the presidency without doing dramatically better than Mitt Romney among the groups Romney lost badly--Latinos, African Americans, and women.

They further assumed that Donald Trump could not possibly do better among these groups than Mitt Romney, because in their view, Romney was a pleasant, appealing candidate, and Trump was alienating and offensive.

They assumed that turnout among these demographics would be high. And they assumed turnout among white males would be low. (After all, their moment in history had passed.)

The lack of understanding and imagination became self-reinforcing. These assumptions were used to weight polls, producing results that appeared to prove the conclusions true.

The political-media establishment then set about talking to itself, and discovered that apparently everyone it knew was anti-Trump. This explains why Hillary Clinton and her team thought attacking his supporters was a good strategy. They really did see Trump voters as a fringe minority.

All of this led almost every voice in politics and the media to believe Trump would suffer a historic defeat Tuesday night.

In the end, their assumptions proved a house of cards. It turned out that demographics weren’t destiny after all. Leadership was destiny.

If they had not been so insulated from the rest of the country, they might have seen this: the vast majority of Americans found them deplorable. This is the reality the establishment refused to see.

As Pat Caddell reported in his essential essay on “the uprising of the American people,” Donald Trump’s closing argument was a winning one. According to Caddell’s research, Americans believe the following by overwhelming margins.

1. The power of ordinary people to control our country is getting weaker every day, as political leaders on both sides, fight to protect their own power and privilege, at the expense of the nation’s well-being. We need to restore what we really believe in – real democracy by the people and real free-enterprise. AGREE = 87%; DISAGREE = 10%

2. The country is run by an alliance of incumbent politicians, media pundits, lobbyists and other powerful money interests for their own gain at the expense of the American people. AGREE = 87%; DISAGREE = 10%

3. Most politicians really care about people like me. AGREE = 25%; DISAGREE = 69%

4. Powerful interests from Wall Street banks to corporations, unions and political interest groups have used campaign and lobbying money to rig the system for them. They are looting the national treasury of billions of dollars at the expense of every man, woman and child. AGREE = 81%; DISAGREE = 13%

5. The U.S. has a two-track economy where most Americans struggle every day, where good jobs are hard to find, where huge corporations get all the rewards. We need fundamental changes to fix the inequity in our economic system. AGREE = 81%; DISAGREE = 15%

6. Political leaders are more interested in protecting their power and privilege than doing what is right for the American people. AGREE = 86%; DISAGREE = 11%

7. The two main political parties are too beholden to special and corporate interest to create any meaningful change. AGREE = 76%; DISAGREE = 19%

8. The real struggle for America is not between Democrats and Republicans but between mainstream American and the ruling political elites. AGREE = 67%; DISAGREE = 24%

These numbers describe a reality the establishment is psychologically incapable of understanding. So they did not realize that the country--and the electorate--had changed dramatically, in ways that had nothing to do with demographics.

On Tuesday, Americans’ version of reality defeated the establishment’s version--in the form of President-elect Donald Trump.

Your Friend,

Wednesday, November 09, 2016

Winners and Losers

Four Biggest Winners and Losers of 2016
Trump's massive upset victory hands validation to backers who saw the potential early — shame to NeverTrumpers by Edmund Kozak | Updated 09 Nov 2016 at 8:42 AM   

Other than Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton, the 2016 presidential race left other winners celebrating — and losers crying — in its wake.

Of course, the biggest winners were the American people — and the biggest losers the international globalists who earn their living off of policies that too often lead to the American people’s economic devastation.

The Losers
Ohio Gov. John Kasich
Kasich ran his primary campaign against Trump — even after his primary campaign was over. Indeed, Kasich gave a veritable masterclass in being a sore loser, turning his vehement opposition to Trump into a permanent affectation.

Kasich was clearly counting on a crushing Trump loss, after which he could play the principled, liberal-friendly Republican and waltz right into the GOP nomination in 2020. Trump went on to win his state comfortably without Kasich’s support or vote. The Ohio governor wrote in Arizona Sen. John McCain for president — the GOP nominee won Ohio by roughly 9 points.

The National Review Editorial Board
In its staunch opposition to Trump, the National Review proved itself to be as out of touch and elitist as the liberals it frequently took to task. The magazine had forgotten its roots. No longer willing to stand athwart history yelling stop, it resigned itself to standing meekly by muttering not so fast.

The magazine had become too wedded to neoconservative foreign policy and neoliberal economic policy, forgetting that the prime role of a conservative is — as the name suggests — to conserve, not to allow the middle class to be eroded and the country to wage war across much of the Middle East.

Bill Kristol and The Weekly Standard
The neoconservatives may still have their claws firmly around the National Review, but Trump’s win proves once and for all their grip on the GOP has ended. Kristol and his neoconservative cabal at The Weekly Standard were more unwilling than even the National Review to treat Trump as a serious candidate.

Indeed, so distraught were they at the thought of a Trump presidency that they even fielded their own candidate — Evan McMullin — to run against Trump after failing to draft National Review writer David French for the ego-driven, electoral suicide mission.

President Obama
Obama may be the biggest loser in this election. Indeed, he and his "legacy" were the only positive reason the Democrats could come up with for voters to choose Hillary Clinton.

Pundit after pundit described Hillary as "running for Obama's third term," and Obama himself called on supporters to protect the progress he has brought to the country. Turns out the American people aren't nearly as proud of Obama's legacy as he is.

The Winners
Sen. Jeff Sessions
Sen. Sessions was the first and only senator who actually endorsed Trump prior to his securing the Republican nomination. He was also the first and only Republican senator who seemed to sense the utter destruction that globalization and mass migration worked — and will continue to work — on the U.S. The senator from Alabama had been sounding the alarm of the issues of trade and an unchecked, lawless immigration system for years before those issues provided the policy fuel for Trump's bid.

Laura Ingraham
Like Hannity and Drudge, LifeZette Editor-in-Chief Laura Ingraham was one of the first and only media figures to understand not just why Trump was popular, but that he actually had a real chance at winning the election. Ingraham's staunch support for Trump made her a frequent target of Establishment Republican media.

Nevertheless, Ingraham continued to be a vocal supporter of Trump, focusing on the potency of Trump's populist platform. Ingraham delivered a very well-received address at the Republican National Convention. "Let's send the consultants, the pollsters, and the lobbyists packing … let's give the power back to the people," she said at the RNC to massive applause.

Ingraham saw the anti-globalist writing on the wall that many of her peers in the industry are only starting to accept — reluctantly — this morning.

Matt Drudge
Drudge moved into the Trump camp early in the primary process, and his massively influential coverage of the race was no doubt crucial in seeing Trump secure the GOP nomination. Indeed, Drudge was arguably the origin of Trump's "rigged" line. After a convention in Colorado handed all of that state's delegates to Cruz, the Drudge Report hammered the "rigged" and "voter-less" election in a theme the now-president-elect would come to adopt in his own campaign.

"Drudge Report over the years has done a good job highlighting the excesses of the Left and the excesses of liberalism, and about the past month the Drudge Report has basically become the attack site for the Donald Trump campaign," Cruz said in April. It was a very effective attack site indeed.

Sean Hannity
Hannity often played the part of Trump's most vocal proponent on Fox News, even earning the ire of some of his colleagues in the process. Hannity faced significant amounts of criticism from both within and without the mainstream media for his defense of Trump's appeal, and for the fact that he actually made an attempt to understand Trump's positions rather than attack them blindly.

"We've got Trump speaking to our own Sean Hannity. We'll see whether he speaks to the journalists in this room after that interview," Megyn Kelly tweeted of her colleague. It's clear now just who is the real journalist.

Monday, October 31, 2016

Sunday, October 30, 2016

Hilalry Clinton Muslim Donations

Clinton Supporters are like

'Gay Thought Police’ Like Soviet-Era Bullies
by Michael Lucas 28 Oct 20161,302

One of the core beliefs of the movement for LGBT equality has always been that anti-gay bullying, especially of young people, must end. And yet, in recent days, thousands of online comments and threats from LGBT people have been directed against two young gay men who expressed their opinions about the current presidential race.

At a Donald Trump rally in Cincinnati on October 13, Wall Street Journal video reporter and senior producer Jason Bellini interviewed a gay couple who are both supporters of the GOP candidate. Although Bellini initially did not name them, a gay activist later “outed” the duo as 31-year-old Dewey Lainhart and his 22-year-old fiance, Cody Moore. When asked if they were comfortable being affectionate at the rally, Lainhart replied, “Yeah. Ain’t nobody saying nuthin’ about us” and “I have a lot of gay friends who support Trump.”

Lainhart said he works in the steel industry, and is “tired of the bullsh*t government. Time for a change. Trump’s the man for it.” Moore added he believes Trump “would bring more jobs to the country.”

That was essentially the entire substance of the interview, which has provoked an astonishing backlash. Hundreds of thousands of online views have led to thousands of comments, most of them furious with Lainhart and Moore, who have been ridiculed as “hillbilly morons” and “rednecks.”

In a followup report, the couple told Bellini they “have received death threats from gay people warning them not to leave their house or go to any gay clubs. One message to them, they say, told them to drink bleach.”

I have been very clear in my opposition to Trump, whose candidacy and views on most issues are an utter disgrace. I’ve stopped speaking with some people I know, and blocked many others on social media, because they support a man who is diametrically opposed to nearly everything in which I believe.

On the other hand, although I’m a gay man with liberal views on social issues such as marriage equality, I’m staunchly conservative on other subjects, ranging from economics to foreign policy. So I’ve gotten grief from all sides.

In my opinion, there is a rational way to express political disagreement with someone, and there is the mindless, kneejerk, politically correct-taken-to-the-extreme, bullying way to do so. One critic of the gay Ohio couple wrote “How do they rectify their support for Trump with his statements that he would nominate judges to the Supreme Court who would overturn marriage equality?” That’s the start of a reasonable discussion.

But most of the comments have included words such as “idiots,” “twats,” and “dumbasses.” It all reminds me of my first 23 years in the Soviet Union, where I was often bullied by cruel homophobic teenagers and teachers. And on a daily basis, so-called “traitors” who did not support Russian government policies were denounced and ostracized by the larger community.

How is this so different? Lainhart and Moore are not towing the LGBT party line, and they’re paying the price for it, big time. (One suggestion was that someone should “take away their gay card.”) This kind of intimidation is not only against the democratic principles on which our country is based, but counterproductive as well. It gives ammunition to conservatives, who often claim that liberals try to shut down free speech when it runs counter to their beliefs.

And it’s not only individual members of the LGBT community who are denying gays their right to an opposing opinion. Just last week, a leading LGBT magazine published a column by someone who concluded that although PayPal founder Peter Thiel has sex with other men, he should not be considered gay, because he’s a Republican who has endorsed Trump. Who is in charge of devising these bizarre litmus tests?

Some people do “get it.” One online comment came from a young gay man who describes himself as “100% opposed to Trump.” He writes, “We have all turned into a lunatic mob after the blood of those who think differently. How are the people attacking these two guys any different from what they say they’re against?”

I agree. We are a community that holds up diversity as a key principle in our lives, a central tenet of our movement for equality. A poll in September found that 20% of the LGBT community back Donald Trump. I believe that’s a tragic mistake, but I will defend to the death their right to hold that view. The last thing we need are gay “Thought Police” keeping us all in lockstep.

Michael Lucas is a gay activist, columnist, pornographic film actor and director. He is founder and CEO of Lucas Entertainment, New York’s largest gay adult film company and one of the biggest gay porn production companies in the world.

Saturday, October 29, 2016

Wednesday, October 26, 2016

Why I am Voting for TRUMP

Contract With The American Voter

Donald Trump traveled to Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, this weekend to outline the agenda for his first 100 days in office. Trump called it his "Contract With The American Voter." It is an incredible series of major reforms and initiatives.

Trump vowed to tackle corruption by advocating the following measures:

A constitutional amendment to impose term limits on all members of Congress
A hiring freeze on all federal employees to reduce federal workforce through attrition (exempting military, public safety, and public health)
Eliminate two existing regulations for every new one
A five year-ban on White House and congressional officials becoming lobbyists after they leave government service;
A lifetime ban on White House officials lobbying on behalf of foreign governments; and
A ban on foreign lobbyists raising money for American elections.

Trump also called for new protections for American workers. He promised to:

Renegotiate NAFTA or withdraw from the deal under Article 2205
Withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership Label China a currency manipulator Identify and end all foreign trading abuses that unfairly impact American workers
Lift the restrictions on the production of American energy reserves
Lift the roadblocks on infrastructure projects, like the Keystone Pipeline
Cancel billions in payments to U.N. climate change programs and use the money to fix America's water and environmental infrastructure.

Trump also promised immediate action to restore security and the rule of law. He vowed to:

Cancel every unconstitutional executive action issued by President Obama
Select a replacement for Justice Scalia from one of the 20 judges on his list
Cancel all federal funding to sanctuary cities
Begin to remove more than 2 million criminal illegal immigrants
Suspend immigration from terror-prone regions where vetting cannot safely occur.

Term limits.
Reducing red tape.
Ending Washington's revolving door.
Fair trade.
Energy independence.
Respect for the Constitution and the rule of law.
Conservative judges.
Common-sense immigration reform that puts our security first.

That is an agenda that should excite conservative voters and unite Republicans! That is an agenda to make America great again. And it is a stark contrast compared to the radical left-wing policies we know Hillary Clinton will impose on America.

Tuesday, October 25, 2016

Friday, October 21, 2016

Gore, Trump and Liberal Hypocrisy

The media is beside itself that Wednesday night, in the final presidential debate, Donald Trump said he would wait until the election actually occurs to judge whether or not it was carried out fairly.

Apparently, some people think that when a Republican says he will watch closely to make there’s no corruption of the vote, he is a “threat to democracy” and even a “domestic insurrectionist.”

While on the other hand, they think that when a Democrat sends thousands of lawyers and observers to every polling place in the country to monitor voting and watch for irregularities--as Hillary Clinton will undoubtedly do--they are heroic defenders of the American people.

If the media and the Left were actually concerned about the corrosion of our democratic institutions, as they self-righteously characterized their complaints, they might be a little more troubled than they appear to be by the presidential candidate who knowingly took tens of millions of dollars from foreign governments that fund ISIS. And they might be a little less worried about the candidate who says he wants to make sure the vote is fair.

But the people complaining about Trump’s debate answer aren’t actually concerned about the democracy. They're concerned about the Democrats.

No Democrat complained in 2000 when Al Gore exercised his legal right to challenge the result. In fact, Democrats have been saying ever since that the election was illegitimate.

The left and the media weren’t bothered this week by the news that senior State Department officials tried to strike a secret deal with the FBI to change the classification on Hillary Clinton’s emails and thereby cover up her misconduct.

They didn’t complain when one day last week the major network newscasts spent a combined 23 minutes on allegations against Trump, and a combined 57 seconds on Wikileaks’ damaging revelations about Hillary Clinton.

And they are thrilled that of the money donated to presidential campaigns by people identified as journalists, 96 percent went to Hillary Clinton.

If these so-called journalists and others on the left were actually concerned about our democratic institutions, we might have heard a similar outcry when, in the Republican nominating contest, party elites canceled the Colorado primary so that not a single Republican in Colorado could vote, and then organized to hand the delegates to Trump’s opponent.

We might also have heard something when, after Trump got the most primary votes of any Republican in history, a small contingent of party elites tried to deny him the nomination anyway.

And there was certainly no outcry from the media and the left--nonetheless press coverage--when this week a hidden camera video revealed Democratic operatives talking about committing mass voter fraud.

In one video, a Democrat operative describes at length how Democrats might bring people from out-of-state to vote fraudulently in Wisconsin. While busses might make the conspiracy easy to discover, he says, using cars with Wisconsin plates makes the fraud much more difficult to detect.

Another clip features Robert Creamer, a high-level Democratic consultant who visited the White House 342 times during the Obama administration, and who works closely with the operative who outlined the Wisconsin plan. In the video, an undercover journalist describes to Creamer an obvious voter fraud scheme--a means of registering voters who don’t actually live in the state. Creamer replies, “There are a couple of different organizations, that's their big trick.”

In another video, the same pair describe how the Democratic Party and the Clinton campaign funded paid agitators to incite violence at Trump rallies and even staged elaborate confrontations between paid actors.

In light of a Republican establishment that conspired in an attempt to deny Trump the nomination, a Justice Department that is nakedly corrupted on behalf of his opponent, a media elite that Wikileaks revealed to in constant collaboration with the Democratic Party and the Clinton campaign, and new evidence of high-level conspiracies to commit voter fraud, it’s not dangerous to democracy for Trump to watch for a fair election. It’s dangerous for him not to.

Your Friend,
Newt Gingrich

GOP Angst?

Democrats and some Republicans continue piling on Donald Trump because he refused Wednesday night to give up his right to question election irregularities.

For months now, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton have been constantly undermining confidence in our democracy, routinely suggesting that Russia might hack polling places and saying that Wikileaks is a Russian plot to get Trump elected.

Every Republican leader should be asking the obvious questions: Why would Russia be in favor of the candidate who wants to make America great again and who is promising a major military buildup? Why wouldn't Putin want Obama's third term?

Hillary brags about the fact that she opened the door to Iran, Russia's ally in the Middle East. Together, Iran and Russia are marching toward dominance in the region. Under Obama, Putin seized Crimea. So much for Hillary's "reset."

Given all that Obama and Hillary have said about Russia trying to steal the election, what if there is a shocking result on Election Day? What if Trump wins?

Will Obama and Clinton pack their bags and leave town quietly? I doubt it. I suspect that the left, aided by the media complex, will attempt to delegitimize Trump by suggesting Russia stole the election for him.

To this day, the left refuses to concede that George W. Bush beat Al Gore. Hillary Clinton has said that Bush was "selected, not elected," referring to the Bush v. Gore Supreme Court decision.

John Kerry still thinks the 2004 election was rigged against him.

Here's the latest: Obama officials are now claiming that Russian hackers might try to fake fraud just to sow confusion. Really? So if elections officials see what looks like fraud, what are they supposed to do? Assume it is Russian hacking and ignore it?

I understand why the left distorts a perfectly legitimate statement by Donald Trump. Their demand that he preemptively surrender is just more evidence that the left expects Republicans to lose gracefully. What I don't understand is why some Republicans are falling for this nonsense.

Today's Washington Post has this headline: "Trump's Refusal To Honor Outcome Swells GOP Angst."

One of the factors that contributed to Donald Trump's candidacy is that too many in the GOP suffer angst if they have to actually defend the values of the people who elected them.

GOP leaders should be feeling angst at the news that left-wing activists are stoking political violence against conservatives.

They should feel angst that a top Clinton operative is pushing voter fraud.

They should feel angst that a top Clinton ally in the media was feeding Hillary questions in advance.

They should feel angst about zombie voters.

The Republican Party and the entire conservative movement have been deeply concerned about cheating for decades. That is why GOP states have passed voter ID laws.

The American people are with us. They know there is a problem and they support our solutions.

Lose the angst and find some fight!

Thursday, October 20, 2016

Third US Presidential Debate

The Second Amendment
When the candidates discussed the Second Amendment, Trump was unambiguous in his support for Second Amendment rights and proudly mentioned his NRA endorsement.

On the other hand, one of the most bizarre things Hillary said all night had to do with the Second Amendment, and especially the 2008 Heller decision.

Just to make sure you understand the context, the Heller case challenged the very strict gun ban imposed by the District of Columbia. The case reached the Supreme Court in 2008. Justice Antonin Scalia wrote the 5-to-4 decision that overturned D.C.'s ban on handguns, declaring that the Second Amendment included an individual right to own firearms.

Hillary Clinton said last year that "the Supreme Court is wrong on the Second Amendment." When pressed last night, she said that Heller was about "protecting toddlers from guns." But that wasn't the issue at all.

Just to make sure you understand how extreme Clinton is on gun rights, she used the issue in the Democrat primaries in order to run to the left of Bernie Sanders! Among other things, Hillary thinks it is "incomprehensible" that we don't allow gun manufacturers to be sued into bankruptcy.

A final point on the Supreme Court: Donald Trump's strong pledge to appoint pro-life, conservative justices was a reminder that when you vote for a presidential candidate, you are also voting for thousands of political appointees and hundreds of judges.

Whatever flaws you think Trump has, keep in mind the kinds of people each candidate would bring into government. You know what kind of people the Clintons will put into power. Trump's choice of a running mate, Mike Pence, and his outreach to the Heritage Foundation and other conservative groups, says a lot about the people he will bring with him.

This is a night-and-day difference that should eviserate the arguments of the #NeverTrumpers. It's like saying #NeverScalia or #NeverThomas. That is the kind of childish nonsense our country simply cannot afford at this critical moment in history.

When the debate shifted to immigration, Trump pointed out that Clinton is promising a massive amnesty, while the nation's Border Patrol agents have endorsed him. He explained that strong border controls, including a wall, would help to keep drugs and criminals out of the country.

(By the way, sexual assault has been in the headlines lately. But did you know that a 2011 government report found that illegal immigrants had committed 70,000 sexual offenses?)

Trump also pointed out that Hillary had privately assured globalists at a foreign bank that her dream was an America with "open borders."

Clinton suggested that she was really talking about energy. (But she opposes the Keystone pipeline.) Then she blamed the leaked speech excerpt on Russia, and attempted to portray Trump as a puppet of Vladimir Putin.

Trump slammed Hillary, saying, "That was a great pivot off the fact that she wants open borders, OK? How did we get on to Putin?"

Respecting The Results
There were many other great points made last night, but I have to address something that came up in the latter half of the debate as it is the only thing the media are talking about today.

Moderator Chris Wallace asked Trump last night if he was willing to state on stage that he would "absolutely accept the result of this election." The question came in response to concerns Trump has expressed recently about voter fraud.

Not surprisingly, Trump did not accept Wallace's invitation to preemptively surrender his right to challenge the vote count in the courts or to demand recounts if there are any irregularities. (By the way, Trump is hardly alone on this -- 72% of Americans say they have concerns "about the security of the electoral system.")

Trump blasted the media's corruption, referred to a Pew study that found major problems with our voter rolls and criticized the fact that Hillary Clinton was even a candidate given how she jeopardized our national security.

Hillary condemned Trump's response as "horrifying." Immediately after the debate and all day today the media have been denouncing Trump for disrespecting our democratic process.

My friends, ignore the left-wing media! All this faux outrage is simply meant to reinforce Hillary's narrative that Trump is unfit to be president.

Where was the media's outrage when Al Gore refused to accept his defeat -- FOR FIVE LONG WEEKS?

Given all that we have seen in recent days -- GOP offices firebombed, voter fraud schemes busted up, emails from Hillary's campaign chairman that appear to encourage illegal voting and videos of left-wing activists plotting political violence -- why on earth would Donald Trump publicly waive his right to fight anything that looks suspicious?

Had he done so last night, he would have given the left a green light to cheat as much as it could.

Instead, Trump put the left and the media on notice. And he demonstrated once again why he is the GOP nominee -- HE IS A FIGHTER!

During the primaries, huge percentages of Republican voters said they felt "betrayed" by their party. Conservatives are sick and tired of establishment politicians who refuse to FIGHT the left.

The media, Democrats and some Republicans have been blasting Trump for suggesting the election may be rigged. But Rush Limbaugh made a great observation today. He noted that Obama and Hillary have spent weeks blasting the Russians for interfering in our elections, attempting to rig them for Trump.

Perhaps someone should ask Hillary if she is prepared to accept the results of the election! Or will she and Obama make the absurd claim that Putin stole the election?

Tuesday, October 18, 2016

The Rigged US Political Sytem

Rigged System Update

As yesterday's report was going out, there was breaking news from James O'Keefe and Project Veritas that every conservative needs to know.

For months we have seen the media breathlessly report every disturbance and every act of violence at Trump rallies and suggest that somehow Trump was the cause of this turmoil. The media reported it in order to discourage conservatives and convince them that Trump was simply beyond the pale, too controversial or radioactive for reasonable people to consider supporting.

Well, we learned yesterday that this was all part of a vast left-wing conspiracy to disrupt the election and create a false narrative for the media's consumption.

Groups linked to the Clinton campaign were sending "rent-a-mobs" into Trump events in order to deliberately create chaos. And they were unapologetic in their attempts to sabotage the election. One official involved in the effort is caught on tape saying, "It doesn't matter what the friggin legal and ethics people say, we need to win this motherf--ker."

That official was fired yesterday. But wait. . . There's more!

O'Keefe released a second video today featuring a left-wing amnesty advocate discussing voter fraud.

If big media had any objectivity at all, they would be demanding a thorough investigation of these disgusting and systematic voter suppression and voter fraud efforts aimed at rigging our election.

Sunday, October 16, 2016

Wednesday, October 12, 2016

Lyin' Hillary

The Political Left in America

Media Collusion
Donald Trump recently told supporters that Hillary Clinton "wouldn't have chance" without the media's support. He is probably right.

Recent revelations by Wikileaks prove beyond any doubt that we do not have an independent press. The so-called "mainstream media" are willing mouthpieces for Democrat propaganda. And the collusion with the left is all designed to demoralize conservatives and pre-determine the outcome of elections.

Here are just a few examples of the media's collusion with the Clinton campaign:

CNBC's John Harwood -- who was allowed to moderate a Republican primary debate -- often emailed Hillary's campaign chairman, John Podesta, telling him how "good" or "strong" Hillary was. Harwood congratulated Podesta on Hillary's primary victories over Bernie Sanders. In one case, Harwood wrote Podesta about a story he was working on and how it was something "she wants." In other messages, Harwood provided talking points on the GOP candidates or various issues.

DNC Chairwoman Donna Brazile sent an email to Jennifer Palmieri, Clinton's communications director, telling Palmieri, "From time to time I get the questions in advance." Brazile shared a question about the death penalty. The next day, Hillary was asked a nearly identical question during a CNN town hall event. We also know that Clinton has gotten other questions in advance.

A New York Times reporter emailed Palmieri about a story he was writing on Hillary. The reporter told Palmieri, "You could veto what you didn't want."

The Clinton campaign was coordinating its messaging with Univision.

We know from other Wikileaks that even Chelsea Clinton has concerns about the corruption at the Clinton Foundation and that a liberal journalist thought Hillary lied "candidly." Of course, she does. She has had a lot of practice.

Not surprisingly, the Media Research Center notes that the big three networks have devoted 15 times more coverage to Trump's decade-old comments than to Hillary's Wikileaks revelations.

Mocking Faith

We also learned from leaks today that Hillary's top campaign operatives and their left-wing allies were mocking conservative Catholics and evangelicals.

In one exchange, Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta discusses with a left-wing activist plans for infiltrating the Catholic Church to achieve a "Catholic Spring," meaning a liberalizing of the church's orthodox teachings. Podesta assured the activist that the left has already set up groups to do that.

In another exchange, John Halpin at the left-wing Center for American Progress (founded by Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta) emailed Jennifer Palmieri, who now serves as Clinton's communications director, about a magazine article that described Rupert Murdoch's decision to raise his children as Catholics.

Halpin wrote: "Friggin' Murdoch baptized his kids in Jordan where John the Baptist baptized Jesus. Many of the most powerful elements of the conservative movement are all Catholic . . . It's an amazing bastardization of the faith."

Palmieri replied, "I imagine they think it is the most socially acceptable politically conservative religion. Their rich friends wouldn't understand if they became evangelicals."

Karl Rove blasted the exchange as evidence of religious bigotry. "They mock deeply held beliefs. They mock the idea that two conservative Catholics would have their children baptized in the same river where John the Baptist baptized Jesus," Rove said. "This is so insensitive . . . it really borders on religious bigotry. . . This is unacceptable and Hillary Clinton ought to repudiate it," Rove added.

Brian Burch of called for Palmieri to be fired, saying, "Had Palmieri spoken this way about other groups, she would be dismissed."

My friends, let me remind you that Hillary Clinton has said that "deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs have to be changed" in order to accommodate the left's radical social agenda.

Sadly, some values voters are trashing Trump with the inevitable consequence that they will enable Hillary Clinton to become president. Their actions, if successful, will allow her to replace Justice Scalia, giving the left veto power over our First Amendment rights of free speech and religious liberty, as well as our Second Amendment rights of self-defense.

Going Forward

As you know, some Republican leaders and virtually the entire GOP consulting class are attempting to torpedo Donald Trump's campaign. It would be foolish to suggest that their efforts are not making the task of defeating Hillary Clinton more difficult.

Trump understandably was calling out some of those individuals by name last night. But here's what I would recommend he do: Use their actions to reinforce the major theme of his campaign -- that there is a corrupt elite in Washington, mostly on the left but also within the Republican establishment, and their agenda is hurting Main Street and putting our country in grave danger.

This corrupt elite refuses to secure the border, forcing working class men and women to compete against illegal immigrants for jobs and straining local public services. Our sons and daughters can be sent to secure the border of Iraq, but our elites refuses to secure our own borders.

Their trade policies are gutting our manufacturing base, sending jobs overseas and forcing American workers to compete against the slave wages of Third World workers.

When our vets return from the Middle East, they are unable to get the care they deserve at the VA. Democrats covered up the incompetence, corruption and waste at the VA, but Republicans failed to bring anyone to justice or to significantly reform the agency. Republicans talk about tax reform, but it never happens. No one has gone to jail for the IRS scandal, Fast and Furious or Benghazi.

This is not a hard case to make. In fact, a new study has found that the number one "fear" Americans have right now is government corruption. The second greatest fear is terrorism.

Meanwhile, a new Gallup survey finds that 54% of Americans think the government is too big and doing too much. Only 41% of Americans think the government should do more.

On these major issues -- political corruption, radical Islamic terrorism and the size of government -- the American people side with Donald Trump!

Sunday, September 25, 2016

Thursday, September 22, 2016