Saturday, March 28, 2009

Democrats: Party of Evil

Democrats: The Party of Evil
You know, during an important time of my life I was a left-wing Democrat: I believed in everything they did, from a pro-abortion stance to redistribution of wealth from the wealthy to the poor. However, reality finally overcame all my idealism and I began to see the world for what it really is, not what it could or should be. That was the major reason I left the Democrat party in the early 1990s. Now, the US liberals have become utterly evil. The reason I say this is because of the following:

Democrats are anti-military: they have insisted on taking pictures of US soldiers returning from Iraq in coffins, have always sought to gut the US military capability because they believed (wrongly) that if the US had power-projection abilities within the US military, it would be used, and have vilified Marines and other valiant soldiers by attacking recruiting offices in major cities around the country as well as trying their best to kick off ROTC from universities and even from high schools.

Democrats are anti-religious: unless you are a pagan, atheist, or muslim, you are an enemy of the liberals in America. They hate and despise religious Americans, especially Christians and Catholics. Look at the "bad guys" in movies and TV shows from Hollywood; almost always they are shown to be "evil Christians" intent on killing you or oppressing you; as if leftist don't oppress anyone or coerce people to their viewpoint! In fact, liberals and leftists are waging an all-out war against their fellow Americans because they are utterly intolerant of their Christian neighbors. Its pure and total hatred, and such thoughts and actions are evil, wrong, and just plain un-American. The godless flock to the Democratic party in the USA; they are a party that enjoys evil, and the pain and suffering of people that its okay to hate. In the 2008 election, over 90% of atheists voted for the Democrats, thus proving my point using simple statistics.

Democrats are anti-life: only the leftists in the USA have pursued a pro-death agenda, seeking to destroy as many humans as possible through abortion, infanticide, and the killing of the elderly, the handicapped, and the terminally ill. They even approve of "Tiller the Baby Killer", who aborted over eleven thousand 7, 8, and 9 month old babies in the womb (for $5,000 each). He was even supported by the governor of Kansas, Kathleen Sabelius, who received money from Tiller's baby killing mill. Democrats seek to kill babies while freeing criminals from death row, a shocking thought if you just let it sink in. They wish to free to guilty and punish or kill the innocent, an evil act by any measure. Even now Democratic groups support pro-death laws like assisted suicide; the problem is when the state has to pay too much for a persons' health care, they make them take the suicide pill instead (this happened in Oregon last year). In fact, abortionists have killed over 45 million people in America alone, mass genocide in my mind and the mind of God.

Democrats are anti-technology: from wanting to blow up the vital dams in Washington state so that the fish can be happy (dams that stop terrific flooding in the area, provide year-long water to create huge food resources, and generate 4,000 megawatts of power) to trying to keep anyone from creating power from other than "renewable" sources. These renewable sources are ineffective and their single-minded promotion is the beginning of a neo-Luddite movement (anti-technology) in this country. In fact, "green" Democrats seem to think that anything humans do is evil, that we are evil. That sort of thinking IS evil. Human beings are great, are creative, and can be wonderful not just all bad. The hatred of humanity and its works sounds exactly like the way Satan thinks: he hates humans, children, and anything we accomplish. He is the most perfect, most vicious hater and apparently he has many disciples in the Democratic party. Here is another example of anti-technological thinking: there is a huge move away from bottled water, which is stupid. Not only does jointly sharing water sources spread all sorts of diseases like typhus and cholera but its important for Americans to drink more water, and less soda. These Luddite Cassandras whine about the impact of plastic on the environment, but since they are such backward-looking people they cannot see simple facts like within a few months or years, scientists will create a plastic eating bug that will easily burrow into waste landfills and eat the plastic that these anti-tech fanatics say will be around for thousands of years afterward. They don't want anyone to use anything that advances human life on this planet because they hate human progress if it disturbs a single butterfly: message is "bugs are more important than people".

Democrats are anti-science: from their foolish anti-tech fanaticism to declaring that the "debate on global warming is over", Democrats refuse to see the truth, or hearing about it from someone else. Their bizarre anti-science viewpoint will not believe that the Sun is actually heating both the Earth and Mars up, nothing Man is doing. The blind faith they put into the science that proves their beliefs, and their refusal to even consider any other information is anti-scientific in of itself. In fact, Michael Crichton said that the propaganda and lies pouring out of the Left is destroying scientific truth across the globe, that a new persecution of anyone who believes different is coming, and that is a new mindless ideological (and godless) Spanish Inquisition. Democrats refuse to see even simple answers to basic problems facing our nation and the world because it doesn't fit into their worldview. They are statist, pure evil because they fly in the face of whatever is true and good and right.

Democrats are anti-energy: from opposing fuels that are readily available (oil and natural gas) to opposing nuclear power, the Democratic party is wedded to an anti-energy ideology. The Big Lie in the 1970s and 1980s was "acid rain", but that was disproven so they had to move to something else: CFCs and carbon pollution. The real truth was CFCs never destroyed the ozone layer, the hole over the South Pole is a naturally occurring event that comes and goes, regardless of CFC levels. So too is the carbon ponzi scheme, a enormous evil lie that is only a meant to shift wealth from rich nations to poor nations; a radical scam. Energy policy in the USA is being run by a bunch of fanatics who hate human progress, so they will stop it by using these retro tactics.

Democrats are anti-family: from promoting radical homosexual agendas that leave little room for traditional families to zero efforts in promoting pro-family values or policies, the Democratic party has decided to wage war on the traditional family. The hatred spewed at this group of people by so many radicals on the Left is so sickening that decent minded people cannot watch these attacks for long. They will take up arms and fight to defend themselves and their families. In these efforts, the Democrats have shown to everyone whose side they are actually on; by promoting abortions for under-aged teens to encouraging books like "My Two Dads", it is clear they have an agenda, and God help you if you get in their way.

These issue listed above is why I have come to believe that the Democratic party is evil; it embraces evil and calls those things that are good "evil". They are twisted in their thinking and they pursue darkness, drinking it down like water. In the end, the Book of Revelation tells what happens to all these people that hate God, that hate what is good: they spend forever in eternal torment, in darkness because they love the darkness, being consumed by evil because they wanted evil. It's a sad testimony about a once-great party.


Obama "soaks the rich": churches, day cares, and homeless shelters
March 28, 2009

President Obama's glib assertion that his reduction in tax deductions will not reduce donations is absurd. His pathetic defense at his press conference - that he would still give a $100 dollar check to charity even if he only got $11 less of tax deduction from it was both disingenuous and beside the point. And his comment that his reduced deduction would only impact one or two percent of the nation misses the point that it is these folks who are doing almost half of the donating.

In 2006, the most recent year for which data is available, four million taxpayers had adjusted gross incomes of $200,000 or more. They comprised 3% of the tax returns, made 31% of the income, but donated 44% of all charitable contributions. Together, they provided charity with $81 billion in that year. Obama's plan will cost them $10 billion in extra taxes on the income they allocated to charitable donations. How can the president be so glibly certain that they will not curtail their charitable contributions by a like amount or even more?

Imagine all the harm Obama's program will cause. Churches will be hit most hard. They account for the largest share of charitable donations, but universities, disease research, hospitals, soup kitchens, and cultural institutions will also be hard hit. So will international relief efforts that funnel aid abroad through churches or directly.

It is totally dishonest for Obama to pretend that his curtailment of these deductions won't hurt the poor. It will most directly impact them since most of the charities Obama is hurting focus on helping the impoverished. This proposal is not about saving money. It is about controlling it. By, in effect, transferring at least $11 billion a year from private philanthropy to government spending, Obama empowers the public sector at the expense of the voluntary one.

President Obama's recommended reduction in the tax deduction for charitable giving reflects his fundamental belief that only the government can or should help the poor. He wants to keep the impoverished directly dependent on the government - and the Democratic Party - for their daily bread.

The voluntary sector has always been the backbone of compassion in the United States. Our charitable donations dwarf those of any other country. And our system of tax deductions for giving permits us to decide what charities are worthy of our generosity - a decision Obama will transfer to the politicians under his program.

Welfare For Jihadists?
The Obama Administration is the “gift that just keeps on giving.” National Intelligence Director Dennis Blair, speaking about those prisoners at Guantanamo Bay (GITMO) who are likely to be released in the United States under new policies adopted by Obama, pointed out that the prisoners would have to get some sort of welfare to help them start their new lives in the good old US of A. Director Blair apparently thought about this quite a lot and concluded, “We can’t put them out on the street.”

It must be very hard for our enemies to fully understand American liberals. Try to put yourself in their shoes for a moment: First, you are captured on the battlefield where you are trying to kill U.S. soldiers. Then you are imprisoned at GITMO and immediately provided expert medical attention and better nutrition than ever before. Soon lawyers from some of Washington’s most prestigious law firms offer to represent you free of charge.

Then a president is elected who went to a “church” for 20 years whose pastor loved to shout “God D - - - America” from the pulpit. Finally, you are told that the president intends to release you inside the country you dream will be destroyed some day, and the Director of National Intelligence wants you to be paid a stipend by those dreadful infidel taxpayers so that you can adjust to your new life. And just last week, that same president was floating the idea of taking away some health benefits from the soldiers who captured you!

While I ponder the meaning of all this tonight, I intend to stop by Arlington National Cemetery for a reality check.

Terror On The Border
In recent months many news sources have documented the terror on the U.S./Mexican border – 8,000 deaths in the past two years and hundreds of beheadings in a vicious war being waged by brutal drug lords. It is spilling over into American communities, and the Obama Administration is dragging its feet in responding. Today’s Washington Times should prod them considerably.

The Times interviewed Michael Braun, a former assistant administrator and chief of operations at the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA), in its shocking front-page report today. According to Braun, the Iranian-backed terrorist group Hezbollah is working hand-in-hand with Mexican drug smugglers. For now, Hezbollah is using drug money to help finance terror operations in the Middle East.

But, Braun warns, “They [Hezbollah and the drug lords] work together. They rely on the same facilitators. One way or another, they are all connected. They’ll leverage those relationships to their benefit, to smuggle contraband and humans into the U.S.; in fact, they already are.” Today, it’s drugs and money. Tomorrow, terrorists and bombs.

As I have often stated in the past, border security is homeland security. Neither should be a partisan issue, left/right issue, Republican/Democrat issue. Terrorists don’t ask to check voter ID cards before committing their atrocities.


Another Withdrawal
Another week has gone by and another Obama nominee has withdrawn his name from consideration for public service. Jonathan Cannon, nominated to be deputy director of the EPA, bowed out of the process this week after questions arose about America’s Clean Water Foundation. Cannon had served on the foundation’s board, but the foundation shut down after a 2007 EPA audit charged it with gross mismanagement of taxpayer funds.

The foundation received a $25 million grant from the EPA to study environmental risks at meat processing plants. But, according to the Los Angeles Times, “EPA auditors questioned the foundation’s accounting for almost all that money and alluded to allegations of embezzlement.”

Whoever is responsible for vetting President Obama’s nominees needs to withdraw!

No comments: